Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage
General data
Course ID: | 19-IPM-AMU-PIE |
Erasmus code / ISCED: | (unknown) / (unknown) |
Course title: | Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage |
Name in Polish: | Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage |
Organizational unit: | Faculty of Archaeology |
Course groups: |
(in Polish) Moodle - przedmioty Szkoły Nauk Humanistycznych AMU-PIE offer, summer semester |
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): |
(not available)
|
Language: | English |
Short description: |
Year: 2019/2020 Semester: Summer Hours: 30 Language: English Building: Coll. Historicum Room: 2.85 |
Full description: |
Week 1: Introduction Week 2: Crossing disciplinary boundaries to safeguard natural and cultural heritage Week 3: Europe's cultural landscapes: opportunities and threats Week 4: Heritage strategies – what, why and where Week 5: Heritage strategies - by whom and for whom Week 6: Nature conservation for cultural heritage Week 7: Cultural heritage management for nature heritage Week 8: Traverse the disciplines of ecology and archaeology: the new horizon Week 9: Integrating heritage in land use planning Week 10: Ownership of integrated natural and cultural heritage – regulations, forms and structures Week 11: Benefits – new understanding of the role of integrated natural and cultural heritage Week 12: Participatory practices in natural and cultural heritage: networks and communities of practice (CoP), online and offline communities Week 13: Participatory practices in natural and cultural heritage - public discourses, finance and participation. Week 14: Project preparation Week 15: Project presentation - discussion |
Bibliography: |
Abel, T., Abraham, A., Sommerhalder K. (2010). Landscape and well-being: A scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. International Journal of Public Health. Ahern, J. 2006, Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. From landscape research to landscape planning. Aspects of integration, education and application, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 119-131. Allaby, M./ C. Park (eds.) 2013, A dictionary of environment and conservation. Oxford University Press. Antrop, M. 2000, Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis , in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (77, 1-2), pp. 17-28. Antrop, M. 2006. Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia?.Landscape and urban planning, 75 (3), 187-197. Bell, M. 2004, Archaeology and Green Issues, in Bintliff J. (ed.) A Companion to Archaeology, Malden (MA), Oxford (UK), Victoria (AU), Blackwell Publishing, pp. 509-531. Brown, M. 2005. Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property. International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 40-61. Chilton, E./ N. Silberman 2010, Heritage in Conflict and Consensus: towards an international agenda for the twenty-first century, in Museum International 62 (1-2), pp. 6-8. Egoz, S./J. Makhzoumi/G. Pungetti (eds.) 2011, The right to landscape: contesting landscape and human rights, London, Ashgate. Jongman, R. H. 1995. Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landscape and urban planning (32-03), pp. 169-183. Maus, S., 2014. Hand in hand against climate change: cultural human rights and the protection of cultural heritage, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27:4, 699-716 Skoglund P./ E. Svensson 2010, Discourses of nature conservation and heritage management in the past, present and future: Discussing heritage and sustainable development from Swedish experiences, European Journal of Archaeology (13-3), pp. 368-385. |
Learning outcomes: |
As archaeological heritage comprises a distinct part of culture heritage and the nature is an intrinsic element of the past shared culture heritage conforming the local identity, the module intends to focus on different facets of integration of both types of heritage. As these two types of heritage operate in two largely impenetrable organizational frameworks, common concerns of both cultural and natural heritage have hardly been systematically defined. Hence, the module’s objectives involve presentation of different aspects of integration of cultural and natural heritage. It aims at understanding the environmental impact of cultural heritage and significance of natural heritage for regulations and practices in the domain of cultural heritage. It also fostered the assessment of transversal skills and promote the take-up of practical entrepreneurial experiences in education and training. |
Copyright by Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.