Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań - Central Authentication System
Strona główna

Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage

General data

Course ID: 19-IPM-AMU-PIE
Erasmus code / ISCED: (unknown) / (unknown)
Course title: Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage
Name in Polish: Integrated protection and management of archaeological and natural heritage
Organizational unit: Faculty of Archaeology
Course groups: (in Polish) Moodle - przedmioty Szkoły Nauk Humanistycznych
AMU-PIE offer, summer semester
ECTS credit allocation (and other scores): (not available) Basic information on ECTS credits allocation principles:
  • the annual hourly workload of the student’s work required to achieve the expected learning outcomes for a given stage is 1500-1800h, corresponding to 60 ECTS;
  • the student’s weekly hourly workload is 45 h;
  • 1 ECTS point corresponds to 25-30 hours of student work needed to achieve the assumed learning outcomes;
  • weekly student workload necessary to achieve the assumed learning outcomes allows to obtain 1.5 ECTS;
  • work required to pass the course, which has been assigned 3 ECTS, constitutes 10% of the semester student load.

view allocation of credits
Language: English
Short description:

Year: 2019/2020

Semester: Summer

Hours: 30

Language: English

Building: Coll. Historicum

Room: 2.85

Full description:

Week 1: Introduction

Week 2: Crossing disciplinary boundaries to safeguard natural and cultural heritage

Week 3: Europe's cultural landscapes: opportunities and threats

Week 4: Heritage strategies – what, why and where

Week 5: Heritage strategies - by whom and for whom

Week 6: Nature conservation for cultural heritage

Week 7: Cultural heritage management for nature heritage

Week 8: Traverse the disciplines of ecology and archaeology: the new horizon

Week 9: Integrating heritage in land use planning

Week 10: Ownership of integrated natural and cultural heritage – regulations, forms and structures

Week 11: Benefits – new understanding of the role of integrated natural and cultural heritage

Week 12: Participatory practices in natural and cultural heritage: networks and communities of practice (CoP), online and offline communities

Week 13: Participatory practices in natural and cultural heritage - public discourses, finance and participation.

Week 14: Project preparation

Week 15: Project presentation - discussion

Bibliography:

Abel, T., Abraham, A., Sommerhalder K. (2010). Landscape and well-being: A scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. International Journal of Public Health.

Ahern, J. 2006, Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. From landscape research to landscape planning. Aspects of integration, education and application, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 119-131.

Allaby, M./ C. Park (eds.) 2013, A dictionary of environment and conservation. Oxford University Press.

Antrop, M. 2000, Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis , in Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (77, 1-2), pp. 17-28.

Antrop, M. 2006. Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia?.Landscape and urban planning, 75 (3), 187-197.

Bell, M. 2004, Archaeology and Green Issues, in Bintliff J. (ed.) A Companion to Archaeology, Malden (MA), Oxford (UK), Victoria (AU), Blackwell Publishing, pp. 509-531.

Brown, M. 2005. Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property. International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 40-61.

Chilton, E./ N. Silberman 2010, Heritage in Conflict and Consensus: towards an international agenda for the twenty-first century, in Museum International 62 (1-2), pp. 6-8.

Egoz, S./J. Makhzoumi/G. Pungetti (eds.) 2011, The right to landscape: contesting landscape and human rights, London, Ashgate.

Jongman, R. H. 1995. Nature conservation planning in Europe: developing ecological networks. Landscape and urban planning (32-03), pp. 169-183.

Maus, S., 2014. Hand in hand against climate change: cultural human

rights and the protection of cultural heritage, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27:4,

699-716

Skoglund P./ E. Svensson 2010, Discourses of nature conservation and heritage management in the past, present and future: Discussing heritage and sustainable development from Swedish experiences, European Journal of Archaeology (13-3), pp. 368-385.

Learning outcomes:

As archaeological heritage comprises a distinct part of culture heritage and the nature is an intrinsic element of the past shared culture heritage conforming the local identity, the module intends to focus on different facets of integration of both types of heritage. As these two types of heritage operate in two largely impenetrable organizational frameworks, common concerns of both cultural and natural heritage have hardly

been systematically defined. Hence, the module’s objectives involve presentation of different aspects of integration of cultural and natural heritage. It aims at understanding the environmental impact of cultural heritage and significance of natural heritage for regulations and practices in the domain of cultural heritage. It also fostered the assessment of transversal skills and promote the take-up of practical entrepreneurial experiences in education and training.

This course is not currently offered.
Course descriptions are protected by copyright.
Copyright by Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
ul. Wieniawskiego 1
61-712 Poznań
tel: +48 61 829 4000
contact accessibility statement USOSweb 7.0.3.0 (2024-03-22)