Culture-oriented English practice: Debate workshop
Informacje ogólne
| Kod przedmiotu: | 15-COEP-DW-ES-12 | Kod Erasmus / ISCED: | (brak danych) / (brak danych) |
| Nazwa przedmiotu: | Culture-oriented English practice: Debate workshop | ||
| Jednostka: | Wydział Anglistyki | ||
| Grupy: | |||
| Punkty ECTS i inne: |
2.00  |
||
| Język prowadzenia: | język angielski | ||
| Rodzaj przedmiotu: | obowiązkowe |
||
| Kierunek studiów: | English Studies: Literature and Culture |
||
| Poziom przedmiotu: | I stopień |
||
| Cele kształcenia: | (tylko po angielsku) Both content and form of the 2BA Culture oriented English practice: Debate workshop is of primary importance in developing students speaking skills in EFL. Thus, the development of both content and form should constitute the main goal of teaching/learning practice. The specific course objectives listed below relate to these two areas in the following way: In order to discuss a topic intelligently students need information: facts, opinions, attitudes. To meet this aim students will be supplied with texts/ materials that are rich in information and at an appropriate linguistic level (depth of topic, lexical complexity, range of views discussed, and challenging throughout. In this course students will develop discussion and argumentation skills to professionally engage in academic discussions and other formal or informal speaking and writing situations. This COURSE will provide students with texts that are culture specific by using materials which will cover a wide range of topics. The analysis will take into account the purpose of the texts, its audience and indented and produced meaning. Students should be able to read texts critically and be able to analyse the content. This means that students will be able to do the following: 1. distinguish between facts, opinions and attitudes 2. extract arguments presented in texts and evaluate them 3. evaluate arguments and spot biased interpretations 4. formulate their own opinions on matters presented; gather arguments 5. foresee points of controversy 6. prepare arguments 7. develop a line of argumentation in a logical way (avoid contradictions) |
||
| Rok studiów (jeśli obowiązuje): | II rok |
||
| Metody prowadzenia zajęć umożliwiające osiągnięcie założonych EK: | (tylko po angielsku) 1. Giving presentations 2. Class debates 3. Joint discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) 4. Using learnt vocabulary in discussions 5. Giving viewpoints on various issues that have been discussed 6. Express oneself, put across an opinion to others 7. Using persuasion techniques in a debate. 8. Commenting on and or providing support or criticism of others. |
||
| Nakład pracy studenta (punkty ECTS): | 13 ECTS po zaliczeniu wszystkich rocznych kursów COEP i zdaniu egzaminu końcowego |
||
| Skrócony opis: |
(Pierwszy semestr kursu dwusemestralnego. Następny semestr: 15-COEP-DW-ES-22.) |
||
| Pełny opis: |
(Pierwszy semestr kursu dwusemestralnego. Następny semestr: 15-COEP-DW-ES-22.) |
||
| Literatura: |
Jacobson, Michael, Pros and Cons a debater’s handbook: Routledge press, 2007. Otto, Barbara and Marcin, Here is the news: WSIP press, 2000. Nation, Michael A dictionary of Modern Britain: Penguin books, first edition. Garwood, Christopher, Gardani, Guglielmo, Peris, Edda Aspects of Britain and the USA: Oxford University Press, 2000. Lucas, Stephen E. The Art of Public Speaking: Ninth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007. Richards, Jennifer. Rhetoric. 2008. New York: Routledge. |
||
| Efekty uczenia się: |
(tylko po angielsku) Upon completion of the course and validation of its learning outcomes, the student: 1. Can give clear, detailed descriptions and presentations on a wide range of subjects related to his/her field of interest, expanding and supporting ideas with subsidiary points and relevant examples. 2. Can explain a viewpoint on a topical issue giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options. 3. Can develop an argument well enough to be followed without difficulty most of the time. 4. Can give a clear, prepared presentation, giving reasons in support of or against a particular point of view and giving the advantages and disadvantages of various options. 5. Can take a series of follow up questions with a degree of fluency and spontaneity which poses no strain for either him/herself or the audience. 6. Can enter unprepared into conversations on familiar topics. 7. Can account for and sustain his/her opinions in discussion by providing relevant explanations, arguments and comments. 8. Can follow much of what is said around him/her on general topics provided interlocutors avoid very idiomatic usage and articulate clearly. 9. Can give brief comments on the views of others. 10. Can put over a point of view clearly, but has difficulty engaging in debate. |
||
| Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
(tylko po angielsku) Assessment methods: 1. Writing summaries of texts (100-150 words) 2. Reading texts before class 3. Taking vocabulary tests 4. In-class written text analysis 5. Question and answer tasks 6. Quality of oral presentations Assessment criteria: Very good(5.0): excellent performance on all required skills, only very few minor errors Good + (4.5): very good performance on all required skills, only very few minor errors Good (4.0): good performance on most required skills, few minor errors Satisfactory + (3.5): performs to a satisfactory degree on most required skills, few major errors Satisfactory (3.0):performs to a satisfactory degree on most required skills, several major errors Failing (2.0): does not meet the requirements in terms of performance. |
||
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr zimowy 2017/2018" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2017-10-01 - 2018-02-21 |
 
 zobacz plan zajęć |
| Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 30 godzin  więcej informacji |
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Maciej Kielar | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Christopher Whyatt | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Zaliczenie z notą
Ćwiczenia - Zaliczenie z notą |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr zimowy 2018/2019" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2018-10-01 - 2019-02-21 |
zobacz plan zajęć |
| Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 30 godzin więcej informacji |
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Christopher Whyatt | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Christopher Whyatt | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Zaliczenie z notą
Ćwiczenia - Zaliczenie z notą |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr zimowy 2019/2020" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2019-10-01 - 2020-02-23 |
zobacz plan zajęć |
| Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 30 godzin więcej informacji |
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Paulina Zagórska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Christopher Whyatt | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Zaliczenie z notą
Ćwiczenia - Zaliczenie z notą |
Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr zimowy 2020/2021" (zakończony)
| Okres: | 2020-10-01 - 2021-02-28 |
zobacz plan zajęć |
| Typ zajęć: |
Ćwiczenia, 30 godzin więcej informacji |
|
| Koordynatorzy: | Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska | |
| Prowadzący grup: | Christopher Whyatt | |
| Lista studentów: | (nie masz dostępu) | |
| Zaliczenie: |
Przedmiot -
Zaliczenie z notą
Ćwiczenia - Zaliczenie z notą |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.